Month-Long Hiatus

This February, I will be placing my Blogger, Deviantart, and YouTube accounts in hiatus. I have many personal projects I want to accomplish this month, finding a job being one of them. I will resume my regular blogging and uploading in March.

MSNBC FAILS 03 - MSNBC Trashes Liberty University

If Fox News is biased against atheists, MSNBC is clearly biased against Evangelical Christians. Both Olbermann and Maddow trashed Liberty University when it revoked offical recognition of a student-run Democratic club.

Deviantart: Freedom Is Not Anarchy

Freedom Is Not Anarchy Stamp by ~BlameThe1st on deviantART

Your freedom to swing your fist ends where someone else’s face begins. - Oliver Wendell Holmes

Many people interpret freedom as being able to do whatever you want, to live without restraint.

This is no freedom; it is anarchy.

Freedom is not unlimited. One’s individual freedom ends when it violates or threatens to violate another’s individual freedom. Freedom must therefore come with proper and rational limitations.

Consider some of our basic constitutional freedoms:

Freedom of Religion: Does not entitle cults to perform human sacrifice.

Freedom of Speech/Expression: Does not entitle artists to create and distribute nude art of underage minors.

Freedom of the Press: Does not entitle newspapers to print intentionally fabricated and slanderous stories.

Freedom to Petition and Protest: Does not entitle protestors to agitate into a rioting, pillaging mob.

Freedom to Bear Arms: Does not entitle a gunman to enter a government building with an assault rifle with intent to assassinate a public official.

In order to protect freedom, law must be instilled; and it order to maintain law, government must be established. Therefore, true freedom is not anarchy, nor can it exist in anarchy.

Feminists Cry Foul Over Pro-Life Super Bowl Ad

The pro-choice movement claims that it does not support abortion, but rather a woman’s “right” to choose abortion. Yet I’m becoming more convinced, day after day, that pro-choice is really pro-abortion.

First, there was the Daily Kos blog post that labeled pro-life protesters, especially little old ladies who hand out pamphlets outside abortion clinics, as terrorists.

Now, feminists are attacking a Super Bowl ad where football star Tim Tebow’s mother will discuss how she chose not to have an abortion despite advice and pressure from doctors.

Jehmu Greene, president of Women's Media Center, asked CBS on Monday not to air the commercial, saying, "An ad that uses sports to divide rather than to unite has no place in the biggest national sporting event of the year."

The Women's Media Center is coordinating the effort to have the ad pulled with support from the National Organization for Women and the Feminist Majority Foundation.

First off, when has sports ever been used to unite? Sports, by its very nature, tends “to divide rather than to unite,” as I’m sure is true with the Colts and Jets fans.

Somebody should tell these feminists that “choice” goes both ways. Women not only have the choice to have an abortion, but also the choice NOT to have an abortion.

This ad is not telling people to vote against abortion or to overturn Roe vs. Wade; it's simply advising women to choose no abortion over abortion. It’s more of a pro-choice ad than a pro-life one.

If the pro-choice movement were consistent in their stance, they would have no problem with this ad. Yet they have a problem anyway, thus proving they are pro-abortion rather than pro-choice.

Happy Birthday To Me!

Today marks the 23rd year I've lived on this glorious (yet mess-up) earth. Here's hoping that I live to see another 23 years (that is, if Obama and his croonies don't royally mess things up).

In other news, online comedy show Newsbusted! released its funniest episode today:

Big news last week: A Republican senator was elected in Massachusets, Air America is going off the air, the Supreme Court struck down McCain-Feingold, and Obamacare is dead. So liberals, how's that hope and change working out for yah?

Good thing I'm not a liberal; otherwise, I'd be having a lousy birthday today.

Pro-Life Grandma = Terrorist?

On the left-wing blog site Daily Kos, blogger Angry Mouse posted an article yesterday denouncing the pro-life movement as religious fanatics who want to force their beleifs on others, who want to take "choice" away from women, and who could care less if women die--in other words, the typical pro-choice ramblings.

But the liberal lunacy peaked when Angry Mouse labeled grandmas who pass out pamphlets outside abortion clinics as terrorists.

A distinction is often made between the violent and non-violent members of this "movement." The government, the media, and the activists are careful to point out that the Scott Roeders and Paul Hills of the world are rare. Most of the activists just want to "inform" women about their options. Most of the activists care about preserving all life, including the lives of the providers and women.

The little old lady who sits outside an abortion clinic, handing out fliers to young frightened women, full of deliberately misleading or outright fabricated information -- she's not doing any harm, is she? She's not like the Army of God, which advocates murdering abortion providers, calls these murderers "American Heroes," and has even circulated a how-to manual.

But grandma, with her pamphlets and her signs? Certainly she's not a terrorist.

Common sense dictates that there is a major, MAJOR difference between blowing up an abortion clinic and peacefully protesting outside one.

Does common sense stop Angry Mouse from spewing her polemic? Oh no! It gets worse.

The law doesn't consider grandma a terrorist. Because even though she is trying to intimidate or coerce a civilian population, her method of intimidation is legal. She has a First Amendment right to stand outside a health clinic and try to persuade patients not to enter. She has a right to hand out brochures filled with lies so patients will be "informed." She has a right to carry graphic signs, to call the patients "baby killers," to tell them they will burn in hell. Freedom of speech, after all.

Someone should tell the pro-choice crowd that "choice" is a two-way street. Not only do women have a choice to have an abortion, but they also have a choice NOT to have an abortion. Persuading women not to have an abortion is not terrorism.

Now, yes, pro-life protesters can get out-of-hand (i.e.: blocking the doors to the clinic, threatening to kill women who get abortions, etc.), and certainly such protesters are not protected by the First Amendment. Otherwise, protesting outside abortion clinics is perfectly legal and is in no sense applicable to terrorism.

And if her words and deeds and false information succeed in their purpose of intimidation and coercion? What will become of the woman grandma has "counseled"? Will she choose to take her chances in the privacy of her own home by drinking bleach? Will she throw herself down the stairs? Will she become another nameless statistic?

So, because a woman has been convinced not to have an abortion at a clinic, the only alternative is to have an abortion at home or to commit suicide? Non-sequitur argument?

If this movement is successful, more women will die. That’s not hyperbole. That's a fact. And while even the supposedly non-violent activists claim they are concerned with preserving life, they cannot justify those deaths (of women who needed abortions).

By Angry Mouse's insane logic, she would be conisdered a terrorist if a pro-choice activist read her article and decided to maul a few pro-life protesters at the local abortion clinic.

But I guess if people protesting Obama can be labled "racists" and "tebagging rednecks," then people protesting abortion can be labeled "terrorists."

Demotivational Poster - Epic Fail

Epic Fail by ~BlameThe1st on deviantART

Recently heard Air America Radio has gone bankrupt and will eventually go off the air.

I’m emotionally mixed. On one hand, I’m delighted that a waste of airwaves has gone off the air. Seriously, who listens to that crap? Pothead college students with a grudge against society maybe?

On the other hand, no matter how much I despised the station, I did view it as a necessary evil as it balanced out the otherwise right-wing bias in talk radio (sort of like how Fox News balances out the left-wing bias in the mainstream media).

Stewart Elicits Apology From Olbermann

On Thursday, left-wing satirist Jon Stewart lampooned  left-wing pundit Keith Olbermann for the smears he made against then Massachusetts Candidate Scott Brown, claiming "I think that's the harshest description of anyone I've ever heard uttered on MSNBC, and that includes descriptions of the guys that star in your weekend prison program."

The next night, Olbermann accepted Stewart’s criticism and apologized (albeit half-heartedly) for his behavior.

You're right. I have been a little over the top lately. Point taken. Sorry.

Don't you love it when liberals eats crow?

Demotivational Posters - Fearmongering and Scare Tactic

Fearmongering by ~BlameThe1st on deviantART


Scare Tactic by ~BlameThe1st on deviantART

Republicans have been accused of obstructing healthcare reform with scare tactics and fearmongering, being maligned as wanting millions of Americans to die without health insurance.

This is ironic, since the whole premise of the healthcare reform bill is based upon a scare tactic: “Sign our bill (no matter how questionable or expensive it is) or else Americans will die.” Never mind the current healthcare bill will still leave millions uninsured, and will actually hurt healthcare by raising costs and premiums, along with slashing Medicare (Gee, so much for reform).

But no. The Democrats have made their threat: Support our bill, or else Americans will die.

Who’s the one fearmongering and spreading scare tactics?

Mike Malloy Blames 9/11 On Beck, Hannity, Limbaugh, And O'Reilly